The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fabrication and in vitro/in vivo evaluation of amorphous andrographolide nanosuspensions stabilized by D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate/sodium lauryl sulfate
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s120887 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hongzhi Qiao, Lihua Chen, Tianqi Rui, Jingxian Wang, Ting Chen, Tingming Fu, Junsong Li, Liuqing Di |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,390
of 424,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#26
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.