The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Predicting the spatial distribution of wintering golden eagles to inform full annual cycle conservation in western North America.
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0297345 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zachary P Wallace, Bryan E Bedrosian, Jeffrey R Dunk, David W LaPlante, Brian Woodbridge, Brian W Smith, Jessi L Brown, Todd M Lickfett, Katherine Gura, Dave Bittner, Ross H Crandall, Rob Domenech, Todd E Katzner, Kevin J Kritz, Stephen B Lewis, Michael J Lockhart, Tricia A Miller, Katie Quint, Adam Shreading, Steve J Slater, Dale W Stahlecker |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,251,259
of 26,404,318 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#39,623
of 229,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,083
of 380,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#423
of 4,877 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,404,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,877 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.