The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Guidelines for Rational Clinical Use of Fentanyl Transdermal Patch
|
---|---|
Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s414318 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qiang Fu, Na Han, Na Li, Ling Gui, Chen Shi, Peipei Rong, Fan Zeng, He Rao, Yuan Chen, On behalf of Cancer Rehabilitation and Palliative Treatment Professional Committee of Hubei Anti Cancer Association |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#23,726,322
of 26,409,992 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1,785
of 2,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,653
of 380,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,409,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.