↓ Skip to main content

Response to Simpson (2024): Standard heat stress indices may not be appropriate for assessing marathons

Overview of attention for article published in South African Journal of Science, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response to Simpson (2024): Standard heat stress indices may not be appropriate for assessing marathons
Published in
South African Journal of Science, January 2024
DOI 10.17159/sajs.2024/17474
Authors

Henno Havenga, Ben Coetzee, Roelof P. Burger, Stuart J. Piketh

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,791,995
of 26,413,848 outputs
Outputs from South African Journal of Science
#1,144
of 1,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,007
of 380,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from South African Journal of Science
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,413,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.