The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Season of death, pathogen persistence and wildlife behaviour alter number of anthrax secondary infections from environmental reservoirs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2023.2568 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amélie C. Dolfi, Kyrre Kausrud, Kristyna Rysava, Celeste Champagne, Yen-Hua Huang, Zoe R. Barandongo, Wendy C. Turner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 44% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 3 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,805,316
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#8,296
of 11,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,178
of 370,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#99
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.