The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Minimally Invasive Resection of a Foraminal Lumbar Root Schwannoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Medical Case Reports Journal, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.2147/imcrj.s445098 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chien-Ching Lee, Hao-Yu Chuang, Che-Chao Chang, Hung-Lin Lin, Cheng-Hsin Cheng |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,738,130
of 25,360,284 outputs
Outputs from International Medical Case Reports Journal
#341
of 422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,476
of 196,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Medical Case Reports Journal
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,360,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.