The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Spatial spillover effects and driving factors of regional green innovation efficiency in china from a network perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2022.997084 |
Authors |
Hua Zhuang, Hongxi Lin, Kaiyang Zhong |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 14% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,352,073
of 25,374,374 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#445
of 4,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,604
of 433,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#33
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.