The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid space between probable normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer's disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1378918 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hongliang Li, Chunyan Liu, Hong Tai, Youping Wei, Taizhong Shen, Qiong Yang, Keyang Zheng, Yan Xing |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,714,489
of 25,396,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,016
of 5,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,301
of 222,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#12
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,396,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.