The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Predictive Value of Hemoglobin to Red Cell Blood Distribution Width Ratio Combined with Serum Sodium for MACE of Acute Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Elderly Patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s453538 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaoye Yuan, Caixia Lv, Sisi Wu, Huiying Wang, Xiaoyu Liu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 25% |
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 50% |
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,849,175
of 25,424,630 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#229
of 1,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,418
of 170,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,424,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them