The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implicit processes and drug addiction: theory, assessment and future directions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0102-37722013000100002 |
Authors |
Ana Carolina Peuker, Fernanda Machado Lopes, Carolina Baptista Menezes, Silvia Mendes Cunha, Lisiane Bizarro |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 1 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,510,774
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa
#4
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,957
of 212,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them