The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Non-coding RNAs and neuroinflammation: implications for neurological disorders
|
---|---|
Published in |
Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/ebm.2024.10120 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yvonne Chen, Julia Mateski, Linda Gerace, Jonathan Wheeler, Jan Burl, Bhavna Prakash, Cherie Svedin, Rebecca Amrick, Brian D. Adams |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 2 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,866,333
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Biology and Medicine
#549
of 4,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,663
of 209,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Biology and Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them