The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Influence of irrigation water and soil on annual mercury dynamics in Sacramento Valley rice fields
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Environmental Quality, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/jeq2.20557 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luke A. Salvato, Mark Marvin‐DiPasquale, Jacob A. Fleck, Stephen A. McCord, Bruce A. Linquist |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 75% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,437,498
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Quality
#2,145
of 3,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,349
of 309,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Quality
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.