You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using global remote camera data of a solitary species complex to evaluate the drivers of group formation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2312252121 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joshua P. Twining, Chris Sutherland, Andrzej Zalewski, Michael V. Cove, Johnny Birks, Oliver R. Wearn, Jessica Haysom, Anna Wereszczuk, Emiliano Manzo, Paola Bartolommei, Alessio Mortelliti, Bryn Evans, Brian D. Gerber, Thomas J. McGreevy, Laken S. Ganoe, Juliana Masseloux, Amy E. Mayer, Izabela Wierzbowska, Jan Loch, Jocelyn Akins, Donovan Drummey, William McShea, Stephanie Manka, Lain Pardo, Andy J. Boyce, Sheng Li, Roslina Binti Ragai, Ronglarp Sukmasuang, Álvaro José Villafañe Trujillo, Carlos López-González, Nalleli Elvira Lara-Díaz, Olivia Cosby, Cristian N. Waggershauser, Jack Bamber, Frances Stewart, Jason Fisher, Angela K. Fuller, Kelly A. Perkins, Roger A. Powell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 80% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
Researcher | 3 | 21% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 21% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 57% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 21% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,486,519
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#87,751
of 103,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,949
of 189,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#377
of 546 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 546 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.