The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Planning for fauna-sensitive road design: A review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2022.959918 |
Authors |
Christopher D. Johnson, Tony Matthews, Matthew Burke, Darryl Jones |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 15% |
Researcher | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 4 | 20% |
Unspecified | 3 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#945,954
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#93
of 4,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,673
of 433,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#7
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.