You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular cloning and characterization of three carnitine palmitoyltransferase (cpt) isoforms from mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) and their roles in respond to fasting and ambient salinity stress
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2024.1381263 |
| Authors |
Zhideng Lin, Chaoyang Huang, Zhengrui Zhuo, Jun Xie, Hongliang Lan, Bixing Hu, Chengkang Zhang, Kunhuang Han, Weiqing Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,591,909
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#8,288
of 11,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,685
of 346,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#280
of 411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.