The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Research on the cascading mechanism of “urban built environment-air pollution-respiratory diseases”: a case of Wuhan city
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1333077 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhiqi Zhang, Yue Ding, Ruifeng Guo, Qi Wang, Yanfei Jia |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,674,051
of 26,281,700 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#3,241
of 14,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,949
of 348,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#85
of 573 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,281,700 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 573 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.