The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combined Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine as Adjuncts to Popliteal and Saphenous Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Surgery of the Foot or Ankle: A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anesthesiology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1097/aln.0000000000004977 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mathias Maagaard, Kamilia S. Funder, Nikolaj K. Schou, Jeannette Ø. Penny, Peter Toquer, Jens Laigaard, Emma R. Stormholt, Anders K. Nørskov, Pia Jæger, Jakob H. Andersen, Ole Mathiesen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,685,490
of 26,557,556 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#642
of 6,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,487
of 357,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#8
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.