↓ Skip to main content

Transplantation of a free fillet flap from discarded fingers for repair of a finger pulp skin defect: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transplantation of a free fillet flap from discarded fingers for repair of a finger pulp skin defect: a case report
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1363827
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xianting Zhou, Chenxi Zhang, Xuekai Fan, Xiaoming Cai, Xin Wang, Jiadong Pan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#21,332,328
of 26,183,699 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,184
of 4,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,456
of 344,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#18
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,183,699 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.