↓ Skip to main content

Utilidad del complejo posterior para el diagnóstico prenatal de sintelencefalia

Overview of attention for article published in Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecología, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utilidad del complejo posterior para el diagnóstico prenatal de sintelencefalia
Published in
Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecología, March 2024
DOI 10.24875/rechog.23000117
Authors

Fernando Viñals, Cecilia Okuma, Lucía Vega, Catalina Viñals, Eliana Selman, Marisela Esparza, Gabriel Quiroz, Lorena Hormazábal, Belkys Zambrano, Linder Díaz, Paula Vergara

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,753,682
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecología
#118
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,249
of 196,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecología
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them