↓ Skip to main content

The Radiation Therapy Technology Evidence Matrix: a framework to visualize evidence development for innovations in radiation therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Radiation Therapy Technology Evidence Matrix: a framework to visualize evidence development for innovations in radiation therapy
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1351610
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Edwards, Marco Luzzara, Veronica Dell'Acqua, John Christodouleas

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#21,714,050
of 26,673,263 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,964
of 23,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,788
of 355,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#245
of 524 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,673,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 524 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.