The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Single-walled carbon nanotube synthesis with RuRhPdIrPt high entropy alloy catalysts
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chemical Physics Letters, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cplett.2024.141178 |
Authors |
Shu Matsuoka, Kamal Prasad Sharma, Takahiro Saida, Kohei Kusada, Hiroshi Kitagawa, Takahiro Maruyama |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#623,257
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Physics Letters
#4
of 4,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,176
of 170,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Physics Letters
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.