The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Machine learning-enabled design features of antimicrobial peptides selectively targeting peri-implant disease progression
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Dental Medicine, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1372534 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kyle Boone, Natalia Tjokro, Kalea N. Chu, Casey Chen, Malcolm L. Snead, Candan Tamerler |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,800,276
of 26,114,666 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Dental Medicine
#13
of 276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,672
of 339,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Dental Medicine
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,114,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 276 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.