The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Association between the oxidative balance score and low muscle mass in middle-aged US adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1358231 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kun Chen, Qiang Yin, Jiangan Guan, Jingwen Yang, Yuan Ma, Yu Hu, Chan Chen, Wenwen Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 25% |
United States | 2 | 25% |
Ukraine | 1 | 13% |
Finland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#9,077,155
of 26,735,240 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,594
of 7,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,264
of 356,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#104
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,735,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.