The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
VIRAL DISEASES OF FISH: FIRST REPORT OF CARP POX IN GOLDEN IDE (LEUCISCUS IDUS) IN NORTH AMERICA
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, July 1985
|
DOI | 10.7589/0090-3558-21.3.199 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
P E McAllister, B C Lidgerding, R L Herman, L C Hoyer, J Hankins |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Denmark | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 25% |
Professor | 2 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 42% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,675,171
of 25,692,343 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#478
of 1,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,673
of 9,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,692,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.