↓ Skip to main content

Advanced Strategies in Immune Modulation of Cancer Using Lipid-Based Nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advanced Strategies in Immune Modulation of Cancer Using Lipid-Based Nanoparticles
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shoshy Mizrahy, Inbal Hazan-Halevy, Dalit Landesman-Milo, Brandon D. Ng, Dan Peer

Abstract

Immunotherapy has a great potential in advancing cancer treatment, especially in light of recent discoveries and therapeutic interventions that lead to complete response in specific subgroups of melanoma patients. By using the body's own immune system, it is possible not only to specifically target and eliminate cancer cells while leaving healthy cells unharmed but also to elicit long-term protective response. Despite the promise, current immunotherapy is limited and fails in addressing all tumor types. This is probably due to the fact that a single treatment strategy is not sufficient in overcoming the complex antitumor immunity. The use of nanoparticle-based system for immunotherapy is a promising strategy that can simultaneously target multiple pathways with the same kinetics to enhance antitumor response. Here, we will highlight the recent advances in the field of cancer immunotherapy that utilize lipid-based nanoparticles as delivery vehicles and address the ongoing challenges and potential opportunities.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Chemistry 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2017.
All research outputs
#8,016,222
of 26,242,030 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#9,311
of 32,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,725
of 430,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#131
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,242,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.