The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of periosteum-derived cells and iPSC-derived chondrocytes encapsulated in GelMA for osteochondral tissue engineering
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1386692 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hannah Agten, Inge Van Hoven, Jasper Van Hoorick, Sandra Van Vlierberghe, Frank P. Luyten, Veerle Bloemen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
Professor | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
Chemistry | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,540,466
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#3,186
of 8,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,430
of 171,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#23
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,644 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.