The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of Home Beauty Devices for Facial Rejuvenation: Establishment of Efficacy Evaluation System
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s449599 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pengzhi Bu, Ruqian Duan, Ji Luo, Tao Yang, Ning Liu, Chuanbiao Wen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,526,090
of 25,983,245 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#230
of 930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,773
of 342,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,983,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.