The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An integrative taxonomic study of north temperate Cotesia Cameron (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) that form silken cocoon balls, with the description of a new species
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Hymenoptera Research, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3897/jhr.97.116378 |
Authors |
Vladimir Žikić, Milana Mitrović, Saša S. Stanković, José L. Fernández-Triana, Maja Lazarević, Kees van Achterberg, Dawid Marczak, Marijana Ilić Milošević, Mark R. Shaw |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
Peru | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,701,746
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hymenoptera Research
#425
of 636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,146
of 212,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hymenoptera Research
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.