The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Gut Microbiota Composition in Indian and Western Infants (0–24 Months): A Systematic Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition and Dietary Supplements, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.2147/nds.s402256 |
Authors |
Balaji Veeraraghavan, Dhanasekhar Kesavelu, Bijesh Yadav |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,220,020
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
#19
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,311
of 425,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.