The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Activity of afatinib in patients with NSCLC harboring novel uncommon EGFR mutations with or without co-mutations: a case report
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2024.1347742 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Petros Christopoulos, Franziska Herster, Petra Hoffknecht, Markus Falk, Markus Tiemann, Hans-Georg Kopp, Andre Althoff, Anja Stammberger, Eckart Laack |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#21,501,516
of 26,393,142 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,934
of 23,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,655
of 332,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#159
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,393,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,083 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.