↓ Skip to main content

Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Energy & the Environment, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
587 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science
Published in
Annual Review of Energy & the Environment, October 2013
DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-022112-112828
Authors

Christine J. Kirchhoff, Maria Carmen Lemos, Suraje Dessai

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 587 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 566 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 131 22%
Researcher 109 19%
Student > Master 71 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 6%
Student > Bachelor 29 5%
Other 94 16%
Unknown 117 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 163 28%
Social Sciences 98 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 41 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 6%
Engineering 24 4%
Other 79 13%
Unknown 144 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,355,710
of 26,631,263 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Energy & the Environment
#216
of 568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,390
of 226,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Energy & the Environment
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,631,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.