The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
H-intensity scale score to estimate CSF GluN1 antibody titers with one-time immunostaining using a commercial assay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1350837 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masaki Iizuka, Naomi Nagata, Naomi Kanazawa, Tomomi Iwami, Makoto Nagashima, Masaaki Nakamura, Juntaro Kaneko, Eiji Kitamura, Kazutoshi Nishiyama, Noritaka Mamorita, Takahiro Iizuka |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,975,624
of 26,304,916 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#21,076
of 32,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,186
of 332,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#338
of 1,086 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,304,916 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,086 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.