The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Confirmation bias and quantitative approach in psychiatry: should ideological competing interests be declared?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1365733 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martin Blay, Christophe Gauld, Pauline Espi, Bruno Falissard |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 21 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
Scientists | 6 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,934,638
of 26,595,536 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,795
of 13,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,311
of 345,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#23
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,595,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.