You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessment of the Implementation of Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2019 Guidelines for Treatment of Mild Asthma Among Pediatric Registrars: A Quasi-Interventional Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.2147/jaa.s442573 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Iman Bashir Hamid Abashar, Omaima Abdel Majeed Mohamed Salih, Tarteel Abbas Abaker Joda, Mai Fathi Awadalla Alsedig, Alaa T Omer, Hayat A Ahmed, Lina Hemmeda, Mariam Alazraa M Esmaeel, Khabab Abbasher Hussien Mohamed Ahmed |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,952,029
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#157
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,130
of 259,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.