↓ Skip to main content

Lead poisoning of raptors: state of the science and cross‐discipline mitigation options for a global problem

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Reviews, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lead poisoning of raptors: state of the science and cross‐discipline mitigation options for a global problem
Published in
Biological Reviews, May 2024
DOI 10.1111/brv.13087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Todd E. Katzner, Deborah J. Pain, Michael McTee, Leland Brown, Sandra Cuadros, Mark Pokras, Vincent A. Slabe, Richard T. Watson, Guillermo Wiemeyer, Bryan Bedrosian, Jordan O. Hampton, Chris N. Parish, James M. Pay, Keisuke Saito, John H. Schulz

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#7,684,835
of 26,561,175 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#994
of 1,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,485
of 340,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,561,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.