↓ Skip to main content

Comparative effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis using the GRADE framework

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis using the GRADE framework
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, September 2023
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1204831
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuan Wang, Katrin Haeussler, Anne Spellman, Leslie E. Phillips, Allison Ramiller, Mary T. Bausch-Jurken, Pawana Sharma, Anna Krivelyova, Sonam Vats, Nicolas Van de Velde

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 12 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 12 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#18,194,007
of 26,614,447 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#21,358
of 33,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,414
of 364,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#666
of 1,235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,614,447 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.