The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of novel epibatidine analogs in the rat nicotine drug discrimination assay and in the rat chronic constriction injury neuropathic pain model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advances in Drug and Alcohol Research, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/adar.2023.11622 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kevin Luque-Sanchez, Jasmine Felix, Joshua Bilbrey, Luis Restrepo, Morgan Reeves, Lance R. McMahon, Jenny L. Wilkerson |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,632,029
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Drug and Alcohol Research
#3
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,672
of 357,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Drug and Alcohol Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them