The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A mixed methods analysis of existing assessment and evaluation tools (AETs) for mental health applications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1196491 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah Ahmed, Chris Trimmer, Wishah Khan, Andrew Tuck, Terri Rodak, Branka Agic, Kelsey Kavic, Sapna Wadhawan, Maureen Abbott, M. Omair Husain, M. Ishrat Husain, Kwame McKenzie, Yuri Quintana, Farooq Naeem |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,124,568
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,181
of 14,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,425
of 172,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#34
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.