The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Standard Pipeline for Analyzing the Endometrial Microbiome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reproductive Sciences, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/s43032-024-01557-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mychelle de Medeiros Garcia Torres, Daniel Carlos Ferreira Lanza |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,766,229
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Sciences
#220
of 1,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,373
of 160,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Sciences
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.