The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Women's attitudes towards heavy menstrual bleeding, and their impact on quality of life
|
---|---|
Published in |
Open Access Journal of Contraception, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/oajc.s38993 |
Authors |
Johannes Bitzer, Marco Serrani, Lahav |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 20 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
Psychology | 3 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 22 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,766,817
of 25,895,862 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Contraception
#37
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,002
of 214,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Contraception
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,895,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them