The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Harmful Traditional Practices of Umbilical Cord in Edaga Hamus Community, Asmara, Eritrea
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.2147/phmt.s434741 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Feven Beletse Negash, Laban Lebahati Simel, Luwam Russom Tekle, Betiel Biniam Berhane |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#21,534,640
of 26,432,239 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#123
of 180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,787
of 337,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,432,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them