The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cigarette smoking and risk of adult glioma: a meta-analysis of 24 observational studies involving more than 2.3 million individuals
|
---|---|
Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.2147/ott.s99713 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hong-xing Li, Xiao-xiao Peng, Qiang Zong, Kai Zhang, Ming-xin Wang, Yi-zhe Liu, Guang-liang Han |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 28% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 28% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,544,931
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#177
of 3,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,043
of 356,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#12
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.