The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Validation of prostate and breast cancer detection artificial intelligence algorithms for accurate histopathological diagnosis and grading: a retrospective study with a Japanese cohort
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pathology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.pathol.2024.02.009 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kris Lami, Han-Seung Yoon, Anil V Parwani, Hoa Hoang Ngoc Pham, Yuri Tachibana, Chaim Linhart, Maya Grinwald, Manuela Vecsler, Junya Fukuoka |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 36% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#155,807
of 25,964,892 outputs
Outputs from Pathology
#4
of 1,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,693
of 267,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,964,892 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,547 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them