The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chloroplast genome structure analysis of Equisetum unveils phylogenetic relationships to ferns and mutational hotspot region
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1328080 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Weiyue Sun, Zuoying Wei, Yuefeng Gu, Ting Wang, Baodong Liu, Yuehong Yan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 50% |
Professor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 50% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,772,671
of 25,958,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,790
of 24,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,552
of 301,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#49
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,958,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,972 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.