↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of government HIV/AIDS financing: a 10-year trend analysis from 125 low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of government HIV/AIDS financing: a 10-year trend analysis from 125 low- and middle-income countries
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-673
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Ávila, Dejan Loncar, Peter Amico, Paul De Lay

Abstract

Trends and predictors of domestic spending from public sources provide national authorities and international donors with a better understanding of the HIV financing architecture, the fulfillment of governments' commitments and potential for long-term sustainability.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 12%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,417,612
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,134
of 18,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,350
of 210,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#93
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.