↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic faces generated with the facial action coding system or deep neural networks improve speech-in-noise perception, but not as much as real faces

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synthetic faces generated with the facial action coding system or deep neural networks improve speech-in-noise perception, but not as much as real faces
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2024.1379988
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yingjia Yu, Anastasia Lado, Yue Zhang, John F. Magnotti, Michael S. Beauchamp

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,177,357
of 25,994,718 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,168
of 11,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,453
of 215,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#34
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,994,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.