The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Original article: novelty of Canadian manufacture nasopharyngeal swabs for collection of samples being tested for SARS-CoV-2 in a pandemic setting
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1344295 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sandra Palomino-Padilla, Guillermo Caceres-Cardenas, Rodrigo Calderon, Alex C-T. Ko, Lauren Garnett, Kaylie Doan, Patrick Chong, Hammerly Lino, Tatiana Caceres, Teodor Veres, Claudia C. Dos Santos, Birgit Nielsen, Cesar Ugarte-Gil |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Peru | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,876,228
of 26,549,961 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#4,726
of 15,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,326
of 335,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#103
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,549,961 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.