The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Innovations in older adult care and health service management: a focus on China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1404227 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Madhan Balasubramanian, Angie A. Shafei, Zhanming Liang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 33% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
Psychology | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,263,323
of 26,123,112 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,553
of 14,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,194
of 296,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#8
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,123,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.