The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Light manipulation as a route to enhancement of antioxidant properties in red amaranth and red lettuce
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1386988 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annika Bucky, Martina Pičmanová, Victoria Porley, Simon Pont, Ceri Austin, Tanveer Khan, Gordon McDougall, Alexandra Johnstone, Derek Stewart |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,452,213
of 26,101,087 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,244
of 7,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,187
of 159,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#48
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,101,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.