The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Leveraging systems science and design thinking to advance implementation science: moving toward a solution-oriented paradigm
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1368050 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Terry T.-K. Huang, Emily A. Callahan, Emily R. Haines, Cole Hooley, Dina M. Sorensen, David W. Lounsbury, Nasim S. Sabounchi, Peter S. Hovmand |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,531,636
of 26,090,071 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,115
of 14,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,541
of 227,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#12
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,090,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.